Zou
I want to buy HD ready lcd TV (resolution 1366x768 and not full HD with 1080p). IS MY OPINION CORRECT?
I do not have good quality/HDsources (DVDs, BluRays), because I rather download a 700 MB or rather 1.5 GB ripped films. In my country HD TV will be compulsory from 2012, and I am not intended to watch local TV ( I watch only Standard definition (480p) Free-to air satellite TV channels that I am interested in). I do not have BluRay player, and it's unlikely I will buy any original BR discs.
I am very visual person and bad pixeling disturbs me very much, so I am rather willing to spend for a sub HD lcd TV to have watchable TV channels on it than buy a popular full HD TV and suffer watching crap pixels.
What do you think? I consider brands like Sony, Toshiba, Sharp. In Hungary now I see Sharp LC37D44E and Toshiba 37AV635. Also Sharp LC42AD5( but an old 2005 model). I tend for Toshiba. What do you think?
Their price is the same as full HD, butprice is not important. I have now a 29" Sony CRT, great TV, but need a flat TV also and would be happy with 40" or 42 " TV, but 37" is what is available now :( whiich is still okay.
Answer
1 ) you ideal / concept is right , if ref to BUDGET / COST . but if you are looking into total display / colours quality and smooth pictures as you Sony old CRT TV , you are " wrong ". you away some important issue about LCD TV / motion blur / resolution between 720P / 1080P .
2 ) Technically , the only source provide full HD signals is via blu-ray . also our eye will not getting any resolution difference from an screen size below 40 inc TV.
is mean , if we don't watch movies from blu-ray , need not 1080P TV / or even via blu-ray movies from an screen size below 40 inc TV , 720P models is enough .
Remember , TV maker understand such issue more than any other and yet come out 1080P models from 32 inc . also consumer demand for 1080P models ( 32 inc onward ) is great , i should said mose of them who own 1080P TV do not watch blu-ray movies . still more to DVD and cable TV / free view on air channel that only provide 720P resolution .
all consumer are smart , no once paid more for nothings for sure .
3 ) The only reason is " total quality ".
TV maker take 720P models as standard entry level models , every designs are very standard ,( video circuit / refresh rate as 60 HZ .. ) because consider of selling prices !
TV maker take 1080P models as Mid or High End models.
to Support 1080P display , need difference / better grade LCD display panel . those LCD display panel use for 720P unable to use for 1080P models . somethings like low end PC monitor VS high end PC monitor !
to support better resolution display need better designs Video Enhance circuit . ( TV video circuit Amp = PC Graphics card ) ! somethings like low prices standard PC graphics card VS High End PC graphics card , any difference ?
4 ) to cover the motion blur due to LCD display response time , need fast refresh rate and fast response time display panel.
those 720P HD ready models use 6ms or even more response time display panel and 60HZ refresh rate . is really bad to sports movies / game ( any moving fast image ) , such " blur " usually make our eye uncomfortable . ( but some people okay )
TV maker only provide 120HZ ( even 240HZ ) into 1080P models also use lower as 4ms /5ms response time display panel ( some new hi end models even go for 2ms ) .
120 HZ refresh rate provide more smooth pictures than 60 HZ . but available in mid / high end models. is mean you unable to get 720P HD ready models with 120 HZ refresh rate.
5 ) Finally , this and that always make 1080P models much better in total pictures quality .
unless , you just need an TV . never demand for quality .
WARNING .
none of any LCD TV reach old CRT TV colours / smooth quality . if you change / upgrade from CRT TV to LCD TV , especial low end LCD TV models. you will be disappointed or need sometimes to accept it.
CRT TV rich in colour display / pure dark-black colours , LCD TV will NOT. ( high end models look better ).
CRT TV with out motion blur issue , LCD TV need high end models with 120 HZ to cover it.
Budget allow , LED TV ( LCD -LED back light ) really close to CRT quality. but cost much more.
for 40 inc and above , Panasonic Plasma is BEST in pictures quality amd PRICES. new Panasonic Plasma with out burn in / over heat / high power consumption issue.
^^^
Samsung / LG / Sharp / Sony / Panasonic / Toshiba manufactures quality / reliable LCD / LED TV.
6^^^
what is motion blur >
http://www.lcdtvreviews.org.uk/articles/relevance-of-response-time-in-rendering-picture-quality/
ADVICE. if my answer too technically , forget about " technical issue ".
LCD TV. go for 1080P 120 HZ models. very sure , if you use to Sony CRT TV, you never accept standard 720P 60 HZ LCD TV even not for blu-ray. is total quality that you need.
1 ) you ideal / concept is right , if ref to BUDGET / COST . but if you are looking into total display / colours quality and smooth pictures as you Sony old CRT TV , you are " wrong ". you away some important issue about LCD TV / motion blur / resolution between 720P / 1080P .
2 ) Technically , the only source provide full HD signals is via blu-ray . also our eye will not getting any resolution difference from an screen size below 40 inc TV.
is mean , if we don't watch movies from blu-ray , need not 1080P TV / or even via blu-ray movies from an screen size below 40 inc TV , 720P models is enough .
Remember , TV maker understand such issue more than any other and yet come out 1080P models from 32 inc . also consumer demand for 1080P models ( 32 inc onward ) is great , i should said mose of them who own 1080P TV do not watch blu-ray movies . still more to DVD and cable TV / free view on air channel that only provide 720P resolution .
all consumer are smart , no once paid more for nothings for sure .
3 ) The only reason is " total quality ".
TV maker take 720P models as standard entry level models , every designs are very standard ,( video circuit / refresh rate as 60 HZ .. ) because consider of selling prices !
TV maker take 1080P models as Mid or High End models.
to Support 1080P display , need difference / better grade LCD display panel . those LCD display panel use for 720P unable to use for 1080P models . somethings like low end PC monitor VS high end PC monitor !
to support better resolution display need better designs Video Enhance circuit . ( TV video circuit Amp = PC Graphics card ) ! somethings like low prices standard PC graphics card VS High End PC graphics card , any difference ?
4 ) to cover the motion blur due to LCD display response time , need fast refresh rate and fast response time display panel.
those 720P HD ready models use 6ms or even more response time display panel and 60HZ refresh rate . is really bad to sports movies / game ( any moving fast image ) , such " blur " usually make our eye uncomfortable . ( but some people okay )
TV maker only provide 120HZ ( even 240HZ ) into 1080P models also use lower as 4ms /5ms response time display panel ( some new hi end models even go for 2ms ) .
120 HZ refresh rate provide more smooth pictures than 60 HZ . but available in mid / high end models. is mean you unable to get 720P HD ready models with 120 HZ refresh rate.
5 ) Finally , this and that always make 1080P models much better in total pictures quality .
unless , you just need an TV . never demand for quality .
WARNING .
none of any LCD TV reach old CRT TV colours / smooth quality . if you change / upgrade from CRT TV to LCD TV , especial low end LCD TV models. you will be disappointed or need sometimes to accept it.
CRT TV rich in colour display / pure dark-black colours , LCD TV will NOT. ( high end models look better ).
CRT TV with out motion blur issue , LCD TV need high end models with 120 HZ to cover it.
Budget allow , LED TV ( LCD -LED back light ) really close to CRT quality. but cost much more.
for 40 inc and above , Panasonic Plasma is BEST in pictures quality amd PRICES. new Panasonic Plasma with out burn in / over heat / high power consumption issue.
^^^
Samsung / LG / Sharp / Sony / Panasonic / Toshiba manufactures quality / reliable LCD / LED TV.
6^^^
what is motion blur >
http://www.lcdtvreviews.org.uk/articles/relevance-of-response-time-in-rendering-picture-quality/
ADVICE. if my answer too technically , forget about " technical issue ".
LCD TV. go for 1080P 120 HZ models. very sure , if you use to Sony CRT TV, you never accept standard 720P 60 HZ LCD TV even not for blu-ray. is total quality that you need.
Know anyone in office who is not living like Royals?
Baseball P
Just curious
Good health care
Great benefits
A good amount of time off
A nice personal expense account
Nearly 500,000 federal employees now make at "least" $100,000 a year. Plus almost as much in benefits. (those little things add up)
During one recent year, compensation for federal employees came to a grand total of approximately 447 billion dollars.
If you can believe it, there are 77,000 federal workers that make more than the governors of their own states do.
When Joe Biden and his staff took a trip to London, the hotel bill cost U.S. taxpayers $459,388.65.
Joe Biden and his staff also stopped in Paris for one night. The hotel bill for that one night came to $585,000.50.
When Biden and his staff visited Moscow for two days in 2011, the total hotel bill came to $665,445.00.
During 2012, the salaries of Barack Obamaâs three climate change "advisers" combined came to a grand total of more than $370,000 plus expenses
Overall, 139 different White House "staffers" were making at least $100,000 during 2012, and there were some staffers that made $172,200.
It is estimated that the trip that the Obamas took to Africa cost U.S. taxpayers about 100 million dollars.
The Obamas only have one dog named âBoâ, but the White House âdog handlerâ reportedly makes $102,000 per year and sometimes he is even flown all expenses paid to where the Obamas are vacationing so that he can take care of the dog.
He has a retirement account. After all where do you go after the whitehouse. Life would be rough. Half the year he is off now
There is always at least one projectionist at the White House 24 hours a day just in case there is someone that wants to watch a movie. Apparently turning on a DVD player is too much to ask.
In one recent year, more than 1.4 billion dollars was spent on the Obamas. Meanwhile, British taxpayers only spent about 58 million dollars on the entire royal family.
Nancy spends more on entertaining for a few than many in Hollywood for whole crews
The list goes on. Senators, House, and others all living the royal life. And will when they retire as well.
So who pays for all of this extravagance?
The American people do of course.
Do you happen to know anyone who is not living well and like Royals in office?
Who personal expense account is so low the media mentions how humble they are and showing what it should be like
Just curious
Answer
Yes, it's horrendous the way money is being inappropriately used in the US. Even worse if you see the corruption happening earthwide. Some had too much money (less than 1% of entire human population, and in the US, less than 1% live the ultra rich lives of big mansions, $5000 minimum dinner parties, and other wasteful expenditures.
Do you happen to know anyone who is not living well and like Royals in office?
>> Most of them do indeed live like royalties. In fact, the upper echelon of rich people world wide had so much $$ and time to spend it, they waste quite a portion of it. Time is money, and money (while it may be the root of much evil) is important to the millions of household around America struggling to make a living.
Read this
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2192463/What-happens-Vegas--Timeline-Prince-Harrys-day-lost-weekend-Sin-City.html
http://weeklyworldnews.com/headlines/50836/prince-harry-loses-50-milliion-in-vegas/
Corruption is rampant now, and like never before. All those perfectly illustrates what Apostle wrote back 2,000 years ago in 2 Timothy 3:1-15:" In the last days, critical times hard to deal with, men will be lovers of money...lovers of pleasures..having a form of Godly devotion but proving false to its power.."
there was a shocking scandal in one South American country involving human trafficking. An under cover detective unearthed a connected network of criminals and pay-under the table business, so ugly and outrageous, it involved the gangs, local shop keepers, local business men, judges, police officers, lawyers, certain members within the government, as well as clergy men (profiting, helpers, buying/selling, as well as being *serviced*)
Much had been wasted by those who should look after the citizens. The billion dollar war in Iraq, the multi-trillion dollar business made from weapon selling earthwide.
Yes, it's horrendous the way money is being inappropriately used in the US. Even worse if you see the corruption happening earthwide. Some had too much money (less than 1% of entire human population, and in the US, less than 1% live the ultra rich lives of big mansions, $5000 minimum dinner parties, and other wasteful expenditures.
Do you happen to know anyone who is not living well and like Royals in office?
>> Most of them do indeed live like royalties. In fact, the upper echelon of rich people world wide had so much $$ and time to spend it, they waste quite a portion of it. Time is money, and money (while it may be the root of much evil) is important to the millions of household around America struggling to make a living.
Read this
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2192463/What-happens-Vegas--Timeline-Prince-Harrys-day-lost-weekend-Sin-City.html
http://weeklyworldnews.com/headlines/50836/prince-harry-loses-50-milliion-in-vegas/
Corruption is rampant now, and like never before. All those perfectly illustrates what Apostle wrote back 2,000 years ago in 2 Timothy 3:1-15:" In the last days, critical times hard to deal with, men will be lovers of money...lovers of pleasures..having a form of Godly devotion but proving false to its power.."
there was a shocking scandal in one South American country involving human trafficking. An under cover detective unearthed a connected network of criminals and pay-under the table business, so ugly and outrageous, it involved the gangs, local shop keepers, local business men, judges, police officers, lawyers, certain members within the government, as well as clergy men (profiting, helpers, buying/selling, as well as being *serviced*)
Much had been wasted by those who should look after the citizens. The billion dollar war in Iraq, the multi-trillion dollar business made from weapon selling earthwide.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment